Brexit: the day of reckoning for the neo-functionalist paradigm of European Union


Socio-Economic Review, Discussion Forum: « Brexit: understanding the socio-economic origins and consequences » , 2016, Vol. 14, n° 4, p. 836-845.

Abstract

Jacqueline O’Reilly, Julie Froud, Sukhdev Johal, Karel Williams, Chris Warhurst, Glenn Morgan, Christopher Grey, Geoffrey Wood, Mike Wright, Robert Boyer, Sabine Frerichs, Suvi Sankari, Akos Rona-Tas and Patrick Le Galès

The unprecedented geopolitical shift resulting from Brexit reflects deep socio-economic fault lines within and beyond the UK. In many ways foreshadowing the US presidential election of Donald Trump, Brexit brought to the surface and gave a public voice to socio-economic divisions that were deeply embedded, sometimes illogical, but until now had either been ignored or hushed out of ‘respectable’ public debate. This Discussion Forum emanates from a spontaneous seminar organized 2 days after the Brexit vote on June 25, 2016 as part of the SASE conference held in University of California–Berkeley and followed by an open call for papers by Socio-Economic Review. The papers here draw attention to the origins of the Brexit vote in deep-seated socio-economic divisions (O’Reilly), widening differences in economic performance across sectors and regions of the UK (Froud, Sukhdev and Williams) and the growth of poor quality jobs (Warhurst). Meanwhile, the political dynamics of the Brexit vote were also shaped by the fractured nature of UK business elites (Morgan), divisions between locals and cosmopolitans (Grey) and creative but muddled actions of elites that arguably generated consequences they themselves failed to fully anticipate (Wood and Wright). From the perspective of Europe, Brexit reflects a history of dysfunctional economic policy in Europe that prioritized market competition in ways that neglected and ultimately undermined solidarity (Boyer). Here, Brexit reflects a political strategy to both renationalize and recommodify solidarity in the face of fears over migration, and which are likely to have major consequences for social solidarity in Europe more generally (Frerichs and Sankari). However, Brexit is unlikely to provide a durable social and political solution to the wider tensions between globalization and democracy, which also affect all countries throughout Europe (Rona-Tas). Ultimately, the Brexit vote underlines social divisions that combine class inequalities with regional ones, not just in Britain but throughout Europe (Le Galès).

La fabrique des inégalités : Japon, Chine, Etats-Unis et Europe


Traduction Toshio Yamada et Hinori Yokota, en Japonais , Edition Fujiwara Shoten, Tokyo, Japon, Septembre 2016.

作られた不平等
日本、中国、アメリカ、そしてヨーロッパ

  • ロベール・ボワイエ
  • 横田宏樹=訳 山田鋭夫=監修

A world contrasted but interdependent inequality regimes: The Latin America Paradox


Review of Political Economy, January 2016, Vol 28 (1), p. 1-22.

Histoire économique au secours de l’économiste contemporain (L’)


dans Pierre Berthelier, Bourges. A l’ombre de Paris (Pouvoir, Economie et Société de la Grande Peste à la Révolution) – 1350-1795, L’Harmattan, Paris, Avril 2016, p. 7-16, Préface.

L’accord entre Athènes et ses créanciers est inefficace et dangereux


Le Monde, 4 septembre 2015, p. 6. (version complète)

The Great Transformation of Eastern Europe a « Regulationist » Perspective


Emergo: Journal of Transforming Economies and Societies, vol. 2, n° 4, Autum 1995, p. 25-41.

Quelles réformes à l’Est ? Une approche régulationniste


Problèmes Économiques, n° 2374, 4 Mai 1994, p. 1-8.

La Collection de la Régulation 2 La Grande Transformation du Socialisme


9784938661717

 

En Japonais: (en collaboration avec T. YAMADA) Éditeurs, Éditions FUJIWARA, Tokyo, 1993.(ロベール・ボワイエ+山田鋭夫=共同編集〈レギュラシオン・コレクション2〉『転換―社会主義』藤原書店、1993年)

La Collection de la Régulation 1 Crises du capitalisme


9784938661694

En Japonais:(en collaboration  avec T. YAMADA) Éditeurs, Éditions FUJIWARA, Tokyo, 1993.(ロベール・ボワイエ+山田鋭夫=共同編集〈レギュラシオン・コレクション1〉『危機―資本主義』藤原書店、1993年)

1 4 5 6